In Immigration Proceedings
At the first master hearing, the immigration judge often provides a list of attorneys willing to represent undocumented individuals at minimal cost. Unlike criminal proceedings, however, the respondent has no constitutional right to free counsel.
First, those who call “pro bono” attorneys often call too late. For example, the day before the next scheduled hearing does not give an attorney sufficient time to prepare, especially when that hearing is supposed to be an “individual” or final hearing on the merits. The same is true for filing an application for relief, such as for asylum, cancellation of removal, and the like.
On the other hand, attorneys who have a pro bono caseload often do not want to take on more complex cases because the work required of representing a client with little chance of relief is too arduous. For example, criminal convictions immediately complicate cases unless the crime does not involve “moral turpitude.” Each type of relief comes with its own level of scrutiny. Individuals who have made a good faith effort to call every firm on the pro bono list often complain no one will take their case because it is “too complicated.” Judges should understand that. Good legal representation in immigration court is hard to find.
If you need help navigating the labyrinth of immigration proceedings, please call our law offices today.
La Migra 